13-11: CLARITY Act Clears Senate Banking After Kennedy Yes

What Happened

On May 14, 2026, the Senate Banking Committee voted to advance the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act through committee markup. The last Republican commitment came from Senator John Kennedy (R-LA), the final holdout among the 13 Republicans on the 24-member panel. He committed his yes after striking a deal with committee chairman Tim Scott (R-SC): the agreement added a fiduciary duty standard for people working in the crypto industry and attached Senator Elizabeth Warren's (D-MA) Build Now Act housing affordability legislation to the legislative package.

The bill cleared committee 15-9: all 13 Republicans voted yes, joined by Democrats Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD), and the other 9 Democrats voted no.

More than 100 amendments were filed by lawmakers ahead of Thursday's session. The amendments targeted provisions Democrats found objectionable, including expanded sanctions authorities, language banning central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), and revisions to the stablecoin yield compromise that Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD) negotiated in early May.

The Tillis-Alsobrooks deal bans passive stablecoin yield while permitting activity-based rewards. The 3 largest US banking trade groups formally rejected that compromise on May 9, arguing it would accelerate deposit migration from the traditional banking system into stablecoin holdings.

Their opposition was not sufficient to stop the markup.

The CLARITY Act encodes a two-tier framework into statute: self-custody gets a protection floor for the first time in federal law, and custodial holdings get a regulated counterparty. The distinction between those two tiers is now the organizing logic of US crypto regulation.

What the Bill Actually Contains

The CLARITY Act resolves the decade-long dispute over whether crypto assets are commodities under CFTC jurisdiction or securities under SEC jurisdiction. The framework applies a decentralization test: if the network underlying a token is sufficiently decentralized (no single company or team controls it), the token is classified as a commodity.

Any token that served as the primary asset of a spot ETP approved before January 1, 2026, is permanently classified as a non-security. Bitcoin and Ethereum both qualify. That classification cannot be reversed by future SEC or CFTC leadership through enforcement actions, informal guidance, or policy preferences.

The statute locks it in against future regulatory reinterpretation.

Section 409 of the bill creates explicit DeFi carve-outs. Protocol developers who do not take custody of user assets or exercise control over user funds are excluded from broker, dealer, or exchange registration requirements. The bill incorporates the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act and creates a safe harbor for non-fungible token (NFT) developers operating on permissionless infrastructure.

Title VI incorporates the Keep Your Coins Act, which explicitly protects the right to hold digital assets outside regulated intermediaries and exempts non-custodial actors from broker reporting obligations. For the first time in US federal law, self-custody of digital assets has a statutory protection floor rather than depending on regulatory posture subject to change with each administration.

The Two-Tier Architecture the Bill Creates

What the CLARITY Act encodes, if it becomes law, is a two-tier regulatory architecture. The self-custody tier sits outside the regulatory perimeter: individuals holding Bitcoin in their own private keys through non-custodial software or hardware wallets are not brokers, not dealers, and not registered entities under the bill as written.

The custodial and institutional tier is precisely the regulatory target: exchanges, custodians, ETF providers, and registered advisers who hold digital assets on behalf of clients are inside the perimeter and subject to CFTC or SEC licensing requirements. The trade-off is explicit.

Self-custody holders get a statutory protection floor and minimal regulatory burden. Custodial holders get a licensed counterparty operating under known regulatory constraints and the custodial risk that accompanies any arrangement where a third party holds private keys.

What This Means for You

If you self-custody Bitcoin in your own keys on hardware you control, the CLARITY Act is the most favorable piece of federal legislation directed at your operational posture in a decade. The Keep Your Coins Act provisions create a statutory protection for non-custodial holdings that did not previously exist in written federal law.

You are not a broker. Your wallet is not a registered entity. Your right to hold Bitcoin outside a regulated intermediary is written into the bill as a protection, not a carve-out requiring active defense. The practical change is not immediate since the bill still needs to clear the Senate floor, survive reconciliation with the Agriculture Committee and House version, and be signed.

But the political direction is now the most clearly defined it has been.

If you hold Bitcoin through a custodian, an ETF, or a corporate proxy, the bill's relevance to you is structural but not liberating. The regulatory framework being built governs your custodian, not you directly. CFTC oversight of an exchange and SEC oversight of a custodial ETF are constraints on intermediaries.

They produce predictability: your custodian will operate inside a known regulatory perimeter. They do not produce key control. The custodial risk in any arrangement where a third party holds your private keys does not change because that third party is now licensed. Knowing your custodian is regulated is not the same as holding your own seed phrase.

The self-custody protection in the bill also carries a structural limitation worth stating directly. The statutory floor in Title VI applies to the securities and commodity classification framework. It does not change FinCEN's Bank Secrecy Act authority, OFAC's designation authority over specific addresses, or DOJ's discretion on money transmission enforcement.

A self-custody holder using privacy tooling, mixing services, or high-volume peer-to-peer transfers remains in the same enforcement environment as before the markup. The CLARITY Act creates a floor for one category of regulatory risk. It does not address the full enforcement apparatus.

What to Watch

Watch the Senate floor vote, which committee Chairman Scott has targeted for the Memorial Day recess window. The reconciliation of the Senate Banking Committee version with the Senate Agriculture Committee's DCIA, which covers commodity oversight, and with the House version that passed in July 2025 is the next thing to track.

Those reconciliation processes are where the DeFi carve-outs, self-custody protections, and stablecoin yield rules can change substantially. The banking lobby is worth watching for whether it shifts from opposing committee markup to lobbying the Senate floor vote. The White House's publicly stated July 4 target functions as a political forcing function.

And watch specifically whether the permanent non-security classification for Bitcoin survives Senate floor amendments intact, because that clause is the one most directly relevant to custody, inheritance planning, and enforcement exposure for holders across every tier.

Tracked entities this report names, with total coverage across the archive. Follow one into the Actor Network to see every report it appears in.

Other reports that name the same tracked actors — a different thread than “related,” which follows wording. These are linked by who appears in them.